Tue Sep 8 18:52:36 EDT 2009

Greek Creation Myth

Very interesting. I just learned a bit about ancient Greek creation mythology, and it really struck a chord.

According to Hesiod in his Theogony, creation started with Chaos, or nothingness. Out of Chaos came Eurynome, Gaia, Eros, the Abyss, and Erebus.

Ok, so what in the world does that mean? Here are some quick definitions:

  • Chaos: emptyness, dark void, original state of existence, god of the air.
  • Eurynome: not clear... "far-wandering".
  • Gaia: the Earth.
  • Eros: Love
  • the Abyss: bottomless pit, underworld, hell
  • Erebus: deep darkness or shadow, son of Chaos, personification of darkness and shadow

According to the mythology described by Edgar Cayce, the original primordial god created everything there is. This god is Chaos. The purpose of the original act of creation was to produce beings with free will; I believe this fits the possible meaning of Eurynome, because a being with free will can wander from the creator in ways the creator cannot forsee. Also created was the essence of existence, Eros. Chaos' plan was for beings to use their free will to become perfect and to love all creation as Chaos does. Among the beings who were created was the first son, who challenged Chaos' power and position; this is Erebus, who was cast down into the newly created Abyss as punishment. (In the modern day we call Erebus Satan.) Also created at the same time was the Earth, Gaia, so that the beings (us) would have a place to exist and learn without the god-like trappings of power that led Erebus astray.

Change the words around a bit, and this mythology also matches the Hindu tradition, as well as many others around the world. It's not so different from Christian mythology either, as far as creation is concerned.


Posted by Doug | Permalink | Categories: Ancient History

Fri Apr 14 11:34:39 EDT 2006

I'd like to be an archeologist

I figured I should add something to my 'Ancient History' category, since I went to the trouble of creating it.

I've been interested in ancient history, and ancient civilizations in particular, ever since I was a kid. Originally, I was fascinated with Egypt, but as I got older I learned about Sumer, and Babylon, and Chichen Itza, and other ancient cities around the globe.

Then a funny thing happened... it started to seem obvious to me that the civilizations that built these cities seemed to have a lot in common, both in their architecture and mythology. I started looking into that, and I found out that we really don't know how they built the things they built, and that we couldn't duplicate their structures with modern equipment, let alone the kind of technology we suspect they had to work with. Furthermore, when they wrote about how they built stuff, especially the really big stuff, they just said that the gods helped them.

The Sumerians, considered to be the first of the ancient civilizations, just popped up out of nowhere. One day they were nomads living in tents, and the next day they were building huge and sophisticated cities, with complex plumbing and drainage systems, surrounded by huge irrigated farms. How this transition happened seems like a big mystery, except that the Sumerians are pretty clear about it: they wrote that the gods showed up one day and showed them how to build cities.

This is what really fascinates me about ancient civilizations: they all seem to stem from more ancient, and not generally recognized, civilizations. Yes, I'm talking about Atlantis, but there were two others as well.

I won't get into all of the details, but from everything I've read it seems that during the last ice age, around 10000 years ago, there were three large and advanced civilizations in the world. Atlantis, either in the Atlantic ocean or possibly the northernmost pennisula of Antarctica, Mu, in the south Pacific, and the ancient Rama Empire civilization in India, which wrote the Vedas.

The Vedas talk about these civilizations, and wars between them; echos of those stories appear in mythology around the world. So does the 'Flood' story, which seems like it relates to the end of the ice age, when sea levels rose, the Mediterranean plains became the Mediterranean sea, and any large cities, which would have been mostly on coastlines, would have been destroyed.

Why don't we have more physical evidence of these civilizations? We have a lot actually, but it's not generally recognized by scholars. But the really good stuff, the big cities, would all be underwater now, on the edges of the contenental shelves. A lot of that has probably been lost due to landslides from the shelf edges into the adjoining rifts, but there should still be something left to discover.

So that's why I want to be an archeologist: I think there are major discoveries just sitting out there, waiting for someone to come looking. If I pursued this, I would get myself a nice boat, some side-scanning sonar equipment, scuba gear, maybe an ROV, and go searching around the northern Carribean and Bahamas area. At the very least, it'd be a nice lifestyle down there.

Or maybe I should just try to build a Vimana.


Posted by Douglas Webb | Permalink | Categories: Ancient History